Anger was one of the passions the Stoics studied most carefully. Marcus Aurelius returns to it throughout the Meditations, reminding himself that the best response to provocation is not retaliation but understanding. Epictetus teaches in the Discourses that anger is a choice — a judgment that someone has wronged us — and that we can revoke that judgment. Their writings offer a surprisingly modern approach to anger management.
What the Stoics Said
Character and self-control.
Meditations 1.1
Anger in the face is unnatural. † … † or in the end is put out for good, so that it can’t be rekindled. Try to conclude its unnaturalness from that. (If even the consciousness of acting badly has gone, why go on living?)
Meditations 7.24
Consequently, there is bound to be frustration when you exert yourself. You desire what is not in your control: fine, but be prepared to be refused, to be frustrated, to come up empty-handed. [16] If, on the other hand, we read books entitled On Impulse not just out of idle curiosity, but in order to exercise impulse correctly; books entitled On Desire and On Aversion so as not to fail to get what we desire or fall victim to what we would rather avoid; and books entitled On Moral Obligation in order to honour our relationships and never do anything that clashes or conflicts with this principle; [17] then we wouldn’t get frustrated and grow impatient with our reading. Instead we would be satisfied to act accordingly. And rather than reckon, as we are used to doing, [18] ‘How many lines I read, or wrote, today,’ we would pass in review how ‘I applied impulse today the way the philosophers recommend, how I desisted from desire, and practised aversion only on matters that are under my control. I wasn’t flustered by A or angered by B; I was patient, restrained and cooperative.’ That way we will be able to thank God for things that we truly should be grateful for.
Discourses 4.4.15
Remember, it is not enough to be hit or insulted to be harmed, you must believe that you are being harmed. If someone succeeds in provoking you, realize that your mind is complicit in the provocation. Whichis whyit is essential that wenot respond impulsively to impressions; take a moment before reacting, and you will find it is easier to maintain control.
Enchiridion 20.1
If you picture it realistically, however, and don’t think yourself unworthy, consider next the project’s scale. [13] To begin with, you have to set a different example with your behaviour. No more blaming God or man. Suspend desire completely, train aversion only on things under your control. Banish anger, rage, jealousy and pity. Be indifferent to women, fame, boys and tempting foods. [14] Other people indulge in these things protected by walls or the gloom of night. They have many ways of hiding; they can lock the gate and station someone outside their chamber: ‘If anyone comes, tell them, “The master’s out,” or, “He’s occupied.” ’
Discourses 3.22.12
‘But difficult and disagreeable things happen in life.’ Well, aren’t difficulties found at Olympia? Don’t you get hot? And crowded? Isn’t bathing a problem? Don’t you get soaked through in your seats when it rains? Don’t you finally get sick of the noise, the shouting and the other irritations? [27] I can only suppose that you weigh all those negatives against the worth of the show, and choose, in the end, to be patient and put up with it all. [28] Furthermore, you have inner strengths that enable you to bear up with difficulties of every kind. You have been given fortitude, courage and patience. [29] Why should I worry about what happens if I am armed with the virtue of fortitude? Nothing can trouble or upset me, or even seem annoying. Instead of meeting misfortune with groans and tears, I will call upon the faculty especially provided to deal with it.
Discourses 1.6.26
It is with this arrangement in mind that we should approach instruction, not to alter the facts – since this is neither allowed, nor is it better that it should be – but in order to learn the nature of what concerns us, and keep our will in line with events. [18] Can we avoid people? How is that possible? And if we associate with them, can we change them? Who gives us that power? [19] What is the alternative – what means can be found for dealing with them? One that ensures that we remain true to our nature, however other people see fit to behave. [20] That’s not what you do, though. No, you gripe and protest against circumstance. If you’re alone, you call it desolation, if you’re in company you describe them all as swindlers and backstabbers; you curse your own parents, your children, your siblings and neighbours. [21] When you are by yourself you should call it peace and liberty, and consider yourself the gods’ equal. When you’re with a large group you shouldn’t say you’re in a mob or crowd, but a guest at a feast or festival – and in that spirit learn to enjoy it.
What is the downside for those who refuse to accept it? To be just as they are. [22] Is someone unhappy being alone? Leave him to his isolation. Is someone unhappy with his parents? Let him be a bad son, and grumble. Is someone unhappy with his children? Let him be a bad father. [23] ‘Throw him in jail.’ What jail? The one he is in already, since he is there against his will; and if he is there against his will then he is imprisoned. Conversely, Socrates was not in prison because he chose to be there.
Discourses 1.12.17
So if you don’t want to be cantankerous, don’t feed your temper, or multiply incidents of anger. Suppress the first impulse to be angry, then begin to count the days on which you don’t get mad. [13] ‘I used to be angry every day, then only every other day, then every third...’ If you resist it a whole month, offer God a sacrifice, because the vice begins to weaken from day one, until it is wiped out altogether. [14] ‘I didn’t lose my temper this day, or the next, and not for two, then three months in succession.’ If you can say that, you are now in excellent health, believe me.
Discourses 2.18.12
Frequently Asked Questions
How does a Stoic handle anger?
A Stoic handles anger by pausing before reacting and examining the judgment behind the emotion. Epictetus teaches in the Enchiridion that anger arises from the belief that someone has wronged us — but that belief is a judgment we add to the event, not the event itself. Marcus Aurelius practices this throughout the Meditations: when provoked, he reminds himself that the other person is acting from ignorance, not malice, and that responding with anger only harms the one who is angry. The Stoic approach is not to suppress anger but to dissolve it at its root by questioning the interpretation.
How would a Stoic view feelings of anger?
Stoics view anger as a mistaken judgment — specifically, the judgment that someone has deliberately wronged you and that retaliation is appropriate. Epictetus teaches in the Discourses that anger reveals what we falsely believe is ours to control: other people’s behavior, their opinions, their actions. Marcus Aurelius reminds himself that angry people are suffering too, and that understanding their perspective dissolves the impulse to retaliate. Anger is not denied or suppressed — it is examined and, through examination, released.
What did Marcus Aurelius say about anger?
Marcus Aurelius addresses anger more than almost any other topic in the Meditations. His strategy is consistent: when someone provokes you, remind yourself that they are acting according to their own understanding, however flawed. He asks himself whether the offense will matter in a day, a year, a lifetime. He reminds himself that angry retaliation degrades his own character more than the original offense. His most practical advice is to consider what virtue the situation calls for — patience, understanding, forgiveness — and apply it instead of giving in to rage.
What is the root cause of anger?
According to the Stoics, the root cause of anger is not the external event but our judgment about it. Epictetus states this clearly: it is not things that disturb us, but our opinions about things. When someone insults you, the insult itself is neutral — it is your belief that you have been wronged and that the wrong matters that produces the anger. Marcus Aurelius adds another layer: anger often comes from expecting others to behave according to our standards, which is itself a form of wanting to control what is not ours to control.
What are the Stoic techniques for anger management?
The Stoics offer several practical techniques: (1) the pause — Epictetus teaches to wait before responding to any provocation, giving reason time to replace impulse; (2) perspective-taking — Marcus Aurelius regularly considers the other person’s point of view and asks whether they acted from malice or ignorance; (3) the mortality check — both will be dead soon, so is this worth the energy?; (4) reframing — treat the provocation as training for patience and self-mastery; and (5) examining the judgment — question whether the belief producing the anger is actually true.
How to let go of intense anger?
The Stoics recommend working on the judgment behind the anger rather than the emotion itself. Epictetus teaches that once you remove the judgment — the belief that you were wronged in a way that matters — the anger naturally subsides. Marcus Aurelius suggests zooming out: view the situation from above, consider how brief life is, ask how many people throughout history have burned with anger over things now completely forgotten. He also practices empathy, imagining himself in the other person’s position, which shifts the response from retaliation to understanding. The anger dissolves not by being forced away, but by being seen clearly.